[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 Benchmark (2025)

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Benchmarks for the [Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 can be found below. Release dates, price and performancecomparisons are also listed when available. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTestbenchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
  • cpus
  • High End
  • High Mid Range
  • Low Mid Range
  • Low End
  • Best Value(On Market)
  • Best Value XYScatter
  • Best Value(All time)
  • New Desktop
  • New Laptop
  • New Server
  • New Mobile
  • Single Thread
  • Systems withMultiple CPUs
  • Overclocked
  • PowerPerformance
  • CPU Mark by Socket Type
  • Cross-Platform CPU Performance
  • Top Gaming CPUs
  • CPU Mega List
  • Search Model
  • Compare0
  • Common
  • MostBenchmarked
  • AMD vs Intel Market Share
  • Year on Year Performance

' + newMsg + '

';toast.style.backgroundColor = "#AE0034";launch_toast();//toast.innerHTML = oldText;//toast.style.backgroundColor = oldBgColor;}}_AddCPU(CPUId, CPUName, CPUCount) {CPUCount = typeof CPUCount !== 'undefined' ? parseInt(CPUCount) : 1;CPUId = parseInt(CPUId);for( var i = 0; i < this.CPUs.length; i++ )if( this.CPUs[i].CPUId == CPUId && this.CPUs[i].CPUCount == CPUCount )return true; // Already addedif( this.CPUs.length < MAX_COMPARE ){console.log( "Index: "+this.CPUs.length+", CPUId: "+CPUId+", CPUName: "+CPUName+", CPUCount: "+CPUCount);this.CPUs.push(new CPU(CPUId, CPUName, CPUCount));return true;}return false;}removeCPU(CPUId, CPUCount) {if( this._RemoveCPU(CPUId, "", CPUCount) ){let _this = this;$.ajax({type: "POST",url: "/compareAjax.php",data: {action: "remove",cpuid: CPUId,cpucount: CPUCount},success: function( data ) {console.log(data);_this.UpdateGUI();},});}}_RemoveCPU(CPUId, CPUName, CPUCount) {CPUCount = typeof CPUCount !== 'undefined' ? CPUCount : 1;for( var i = 0; i < this.CPUs.length; i++ )if( this.CPUs[i].CPUId == CPUId && this.CPUs[i].CPUCount == CPUCount ){this.CPUs.splice(i,1);return true;}return false;}removeAll() {this.CPUs.length = 0;let _this = this;$.ajax({type: "POST",url: "/compareAjax.php",data: {action: "removeAll"},success: function( data ) {console.log(data);_this.UpdateGUI();},});}_RemoveAll() {this.CPUs.length = 0;}CompareCPUs(interactive) {if( this.CPUs.length < 2 ){if(interactive) alert( "Minimum of 2 CPUs are required for comparison");return;}// Build Param Stringlet paramString1 = "";let paramString2 = "";for( let i = 0; i < this.CPUs.length; i++ ){if( i ){paramString1 += " vs ";paramString2 += "vs";}var name = this.CPUs[i].CPUName;var n = name.indexOf("@");if( n > 0 ){name = name.substr( 0, n-1 );}name = name.replace( /\//g, "", name );name = name.replace( /Intel\sCore\b/i, "Intel " );name = name.replace( /\s+/g, " ", name );paramString1 += name;paramString2 += "" + this.CPUs[i].CPUId;if( typeof this.CPUs[i].CPUCount !== 'undefined' && Number.isInteger( this.CPUs[i].CPUCount ) && this.CPUs[i].CPUCount > 1 )paramString2 += "." + this.CPUs[i].CPUCount.toString();}// Redirect to comparison pagelet locationHref = "/compare";window.location.href = encodeURI(locationHref +"/" + paramString2 +"/" + paramString1.replace(/\s/g, "-"));}}function updateSidebar(){let objSidebar = document.getElementById("sidebar");if( !objSidebar ){console.log( "Error: Object 'sidebar' not found!" );return;}console.log( "UpdateSideBar() Max Compare: " + MAX_COMPARE );console.log( myCmp.CPUs );let pSidebar = document.getElementById("sidebar_default_text");let tableSidebar = document.getElementById( "sidebar_table" );let buttonSidebar = document.getElementById( "sidebar_button" );let divTableSidebar = document.getElementById( "div_sidebar_table" );pSidebar.style.display = (myCmp.CPUs.length < 2) ? "block":"none";divTableSidebar.style.display = "block";buttonSidebar.style.display = "block";// Remove all previous rowswhile( tableSidebar.hasChildNodes() )tableSidebar.removeChild( tableSidebar.lastChild );// Headerlet header = tableSidebar.createTHead();let headRow = header.insertRow();let headCell = document.createElement("th");let col2 = headRow.insertCell();let col1 = headRow.insertCell();col1.setAttribute( "class", "ta-center" );col2.appendChild( document.createTextNode( "Compare List" ) );col1.appendChild( document.createTextNode( "" ) );// Create new rows for CPUslet body = tableSidebar.createTBody();let i;for( i = 0; i < myCmp.CPUs.length; i++ ){row = body.insertRow( -1 );row.setAttribute( "id", "" + myCmp.CPUs[i].CPUId );if( i % 2 )row.setAttribute( "class", "alt" );col2 = row.insertCell();col2.appendChild( document.createTextNode( "" + (i+1) + ": " + myCmp.CPUs[i].CPUName ));col1 = row.insertCell( -1 );col1.setAttribute( "class", "ta-center" );let but = document.createElement( "button" );but.appendChild( document.createTextNode("X") );but.onclick = function(id, numCPUs) {return function(){myCmp.removeCPU(id, numCPUs );anim();};}(myCmp.CPUs[i].CPUId, myCmp.CPUs[i].CPUCount > 1 ? myCmp.CPUs[i].CPUCount : 1);col1.appendChild( but );}if( i < MAX_COMPARE ){let row = body.insertRow( -1 );row.setAttribute( "id", "selectCPU" );if( i % 2 )row.setAttribute( "class", "alt" );let label = document.createElement( "label" );label.setAttribute("for", "autocomplete");label.setAttribute("style", "color: #00496B; font-size:10px;");label.appendChild( document.createTextNode("Add other CPU:") );let img = document.createElement( "img" );img.setAttribute("class", "icon-s-comp");img.setAttribute("src", "/img/compsearch.svg");let x = document.createElement( "input" );x.setAttribute( "id", "autocomplete" );x.setAttribute( "placeholder", "Intel Core ..." );x.setAttribute( "type", "text" );//x.setAttribute( "class", "input-box" );let col = row.insertCell();col.setAttribute( "colspan", 2 );col.appendChild( label );col.appendChild( document.createElement( "br" ));col.appendChild( img );col.appendChild( x );}}var myCmp = new MyCompare();$(document).ready( function($) {// Floating sidebar $('#sidebar').portamento();myCmp.UpdateGUI();});$(document).on('keydown.autocomplete', '#autocomplete', function() {jQuery(this).autocomplete({//lookup: lookupCPUs,serviceUrl: '/autocomplete/cpu/',onSelect: function(suggestion){myCmp.addCPU( suggestion.data, suggestion.value, 1 );},showNoSuggestionNotice: true,noSuggestionNotice: "Failed to locate CPU model. Try looking at mega list to see all names instead.",width: 300,minChars: 3,preventBadQueries: true,deferRequestBy: 200});});$("#sidebar_minimize, #sidebar_restore").click( function(event) {event.preventDefault();jQuery('#portamento_container').toggle();jQuery('#sb_restore').toggle();});$("#sidebar_button").on( "click", function() {myCmp.CompareCPUs(true);});function anim() {var indexcmp = document.getElementById('indexcmp');if(indexcmp.innerHTML < MAX_COMPARE) {$(".cmp-header a svg").addClass("anim-class");$(".cmp-header .number-cmp").addClass("anim-bounce-class");setTimeout(function () {$(".cmp-header a svg").removeClass('anim-class');}, 1500); }}function anim2() {$(".cmp-header a svg").addClass("anim-class");setTimeout(function () {$(".cmp-header a svg").removeClass('anim-class');}, 1500);}function launch_toast(toastID) {//var indexcmp = document.getElementById("indexcmp"); var toast = document.getElementById("toast"); //toast.top = indexcmp.top+30; toast.className = "show"; toast.style.display = "block"; setTimeout(function(){ toast.className = toast.className.replace("show", ""); }, 5000);}

[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz

Description:

Class: Server

Socket: FCLGA2011

Clockspeed: 2.2 GHz

Turbo Speed: 3.3 GHz

4Cores: 22 4Threads: 44

Typical TDP: 150 W4

Cache per CPU Package:
L1 Instruction Cache: 22 x 32 KB
L1 Data Cache: 22 x 32 KB
L2 Cache: 22 x 256 KB
L3 Cache: 55 MB

Memory Support: Max. Memory Size: 3.0 TB (DDR4-1333/1600/1866 DDR3-1066/1333/1600, ECC Supported)

Other names: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz, Intel Xeon CPU E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q2 2023

CPUmark/$Price: 2.32

Overall Rank:
130th fastest in multithreading out of all multi-CPUs CPUs

Last Price Change: $23,580.00 USD Total for 4 CPUs (2016-04-01)

Average CPU Mark[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 Benchmark (10)

Multithread Rating

54647

Single Thread Rating

1657


Samples: 7*
*Margin for error: Medium

4The number of cores/threads and TDP is per CPU. To determine the total, multiply by the total CPU count.

CPU Test Suite Average Results for [Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz

Integer Math402,291 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math256,012 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers284 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting173,758 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption33,078 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression1,769,659 KBytes/Sec
Physics3,548 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions100,908 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,657 MOps/Sec

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 8th of August 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for [Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 5th of August 2024

Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 5th of August 2024.


Search for Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz
from the Featured Merchants below:
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 Benchmark (11)
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 Benchmark (12)
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 Benchmark (13)
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 Benchmark (14)

Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.

Pricing History


CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Server CPUs
As of 8th of August 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
ProcessorAverage CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX75,782
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX62,556
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz54,647
ARM Neoverse-N1 128 Core 3000 MHz43,229
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX40,348
ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHz34,639
ARM Neoverse-N1 64 Core 0 MHz28,064
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz17,779
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz14,293
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz10,428
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 @ 3.50GHz9,328
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 8th of August 2024 - Higher results represent better value
ProcessorCPU Mark / $Price
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz889.39
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz81.91
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX65.85
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 @ 3.50GHz40.57
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX35.08
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX27.83
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz6.91
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz2.32
ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHzNA
ARM Neoverse-N1 128 Core 3000 MHzNA
ARM Neoverse-N1 64 Core 0 MHzNA
Single Thread Rating
As of 8th of August 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
ProcessorAverage Thread Rating
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX3,313
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX2,680
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX2,658
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz2,124
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 @ 3.50GHz2,050
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz1,956
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz1,794
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz1,657
ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHz1,326
ARM Neoverse-N1 128 Core 3000 MHz1,323
ARM Neoverse-N1 64 Core 0 MHz1,089
Last 5 Baselines for [Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz
Most recent listed first
BaselineCPU Mark
BL5065268 - May 29 202442983
BL5064875 - May 23 202463155
BL5064742 - May 21 202458358
BL5060360 - Apr 03 202449067
BL1837473 - Jun 11 202354910

Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.

Popular comparisons for Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz
As of 8th of August 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
ProcessorAverage CPU Mark
Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz54,647
AMD EPYC 9254 vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v466,708 (+22.1%)
AMD EPYC 9124 vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v443,963 (-19.6%)
AMD EPYC 9224 vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v442,448 (-22.3%)
AMD EPYC 9354 vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v467,842 (+24.1%)
AMD EPYC 9334 vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v464,841 (+18.7%)
Intel Xeon w7-2495X vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v458,670 (+7.4%)
Intel Xeon w7-2475X vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v454,873 (+0.4%)
Intel Xeon Gold 5412U vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v452,742 (-3.5%)
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v447,847 (-12.4%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v466,689 (+22.0%)
Intel Xeon w7-3465X vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v465,879 (+20.6%)
AMD EPYC 74F3 vs Intel Xeon E7-8880 v460,666 (+11.0%)

[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v4 Benchmark (2025)

FAQs

What is Intel Xeon quad core processor? ›

Xeon processors are based on the same architecture as regular desktop-grade CPUs, but have advanced features such as support for error correction code (ECC) memory, higher core counts, more PCI Express lanes, support for larger amounts of RAM, larger cache memory and extra provision for enterprise-grade reliability, ...

How many GHz is Intel Xeon processor? ›

Intel Xeon Processors
Product NameLaunch DateProcessor Base Frequency
Intel® Xeon® E-2456 ProcessorQ4'233.30 GHz
Intel® Xeon® E-2468 ProcessorQ4'232.6 GHz
Intel® Xeon® E-2478 ProcessorQ4'232.8 GHz
Intel® Xeon® E-2486 ProcessorQ4'233.5 GHz
43 more rows

How many cores does Intel Xeon R CPU E5 2686 V4 2.30 GHz have? ›

Intel Xeon E5-2686 V4 (SR2K8) - 18-Core 2.30GHz LGA2011-3 45MB 145W CPU.

Is a Xeon better than an i7? ›

Longevity (under heavy load) – Xeon processors are qualified to handle heavier, more intensive loads day in and day out. For the serious workstation user, this can translate to better longevity over i7 counterparts.

What are the disadvantages of Xeon processors? ›

Generally, Xeon processors don't have integrated graphics and can't be overclocked. Through overclocking, the CPU is pushed beyond its manufacturer settings. The CPU needs to be unlocked if you wish to overclock it.

Why is Intel Xeon so expensive? ›

Numerous Cores

In addition to the potential of multiple CPU benefits, Xeons can feature multiple cores. In general Xeon processors can have a maximum of 48 cores whereas core I7 processors can possess a maximum of 8 cores. Due to the complexity of increasing the core count, Xeon processors are quite expensive.

Does Windows 11 work with Xeon processors? ›

Do note that there's a separate list of supported processors for Windows 11 21H2 and 22H2. Thankfully, the report only mentions the server processors from Intel – Xeon series– that have lost the support for Windows 11. This means, regular users whose devices were compatible with Windows 11 earlier will remain active.

What is Intel Xeon good for? ›

Intel Xeon processor was first developed and launched by Intel in 1998. The Xeon processors are designed for high-power systems such as ruggedized servers, industrial-grade workstations, and military computers. The Intel Xeon lineup comes at a premium cost and provides premium performance for enterprises.

Is Intel Xeon old? ›

No, this is not true. Xeon processors are still alive. Intel just released their Emeral Rapids Xeon series a month ago.

Is Xeon faster than i9? ›

The higher the clock speed, the faster the CPU can perform tasks. The Core i9 has a higher clock speed than the Xeon, meaning it can handle more tasks simultaneously.

What is the difference between Intel Xeon and Intel Core? ›

Intel Core currently maxes out at 256GB of 8-channel DDR4 but Scalable Xeon and the new Xeon W-3300 support up to 4TB (that is, assuming you can find 256GB modules to fill all 16 DIMMs) making them ideal as web hosting servers.

What is the Intel Xeon processor used for? ›

Xeon processors are used for all tasks with high-end server applications. scientific or engineering workstations and much more. They offer performance and features that are well suited for these types of systems, including multiple cores, large caches, and high clock speeds.

Which is better, Intel Xeon or i9? ›

It is measured in gigahertz (GHz) or megahertz (MHz). The higher the clock speed, the faster the CPU can perform tasks. The Core i9 has a higher clock speed than the Xeon, meaning it can handle more tasks simultaneously.

Is Intel Xeon better than the i5? ›

Cache Size

Users with lesser cache, found in Intel Core i3 and i5 chips, should expect slower performance. For example, a workstation based on the 3.3GHz Intel Xeon E3-1245 with an 8M cache outperforms a workstation based on the 3.3GHz Intel Core i3-2120 with 3m cache by up to 1.9 times!

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Jeremiah Abshire

Last Updated:

Views: 6173

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jeremiah Abshire

Birthday: 1993-09-14

Address: Apt. 425 92748 Jannie Centers, Port Nikitaville, VT 82110

Phone: +8096210939894

Job: Lead Healthcare Manager

Hobby: Watching movies, Watching movies, Knapping, LARPing, Coffee roasting, Lacemaking, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Jeremiah Abshire, I am a outstanding, kind, clever, hilarious, curious, hilarious, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.